no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
: Regarding the corrispondance of raid indecies to players. Let C be the list of players in a raid ordered by their raid index. It appears that after any series of changes is made to the raid, at the end all players from C still in the raid will retain their original ordering (even if they left and rejoined the raid), with new members existing at any index 0<i<=40. | : Regarding the corrispondance of raid indecies to players. Let C be the list of players in a raid ordered by their raid index. It appears that after any series of changes is made to the raid, at the end all players from C still in the raid will retain their original ordering (even if they left and rejoined the raid), with new members existing at any index 0<i<=40. | ||
--[[User:Dekstra|Dekstra]] 09:11, 20 April 2006 (EDT)<br> | |||
''What is described in the "Description" paragraph, is logically wrong.''<br> | |||
''Let's assume it is right.''<br> | |||
''If the raid group was full, than player A at index X left the raid, then player B joined the raid, he/she would be placed at the X index of the raid, to maintain all the other indices, according to the assumption.''<br> | |||
''Then, if player C left the raid who was at index Y, and player A rejoined the raid, the only available index would be Y, while the assumption says it should join it at index X, which is already taken by player B.'' | |||
---- | ---- | ||
{{WoW API}} | {{WoW API}} | ||