WoW:API CheckButton SetChecked: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
That's not really correct. Passing "nil" will still uncheck the button, but passing *no* argument (although it should end up being nil for LUA) will enable it, also passing a table ({...}) will now check the button. [[User:Watchout|watchout]] 12:43, 29 June 2006 (EDT) | That's not really correct. Passing "nil" will still uncheck the button, but passing *no* argument (although it should end up being nil for LUA) will enable it, also passing a table ({...}) will now check the button. [[User:Watchout|watchout]] 12:43, 29 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Yep, you're right watchout. Also, I think this behavior was changed in 1.11.1, as it was fine right after 1.11. [[Krellmax]] 14:34, 29 June 2006 (MDT) | |||
Revision as of 21:01, 29 June 2006
← Widget API ← CheckButton < SetChecked
Sets the status of a CheckButton.
CheckButton:SetChecked(State);
Parameters
Arguments
- (State)
- State
- Mixed - Basically expressions LUA evaluates to true will check the button. Everything else will uncheck.
Returns
- nil
- nil
- This function will always return nil.
Example
CheckButton:SetChecked(true);
CheckButton:SetChecked(1);
CheckButton:SetChecked(-2397);
CheckButton:SetChecked("-2397");
CheckButton:SetChecked({1,2,3});
CheckButton:SetChecked("foo");
CheckButton:SetChecked();
Result
Button is checked
Example
CheckButton:SetChecked(false); CheckButton:SetChecked(0); CheckButton:SetChecked(nil);
Result
Button is unchecked
Patch 1.11 WARNING
In patch 1.11 it seems like this method was changed so that it no longer works when passing nil as argument. I have tested that it works as intended when passing true and false.
That's not really correct. Passing "nil" will still uncheck the button, but passing *no* argument (although it should end up being nil for LUA) will enable it, also passing a table ({...}) will now check the button. watchout 12:43, 29 June 2006 (EDT)
Yep, you're right watchout. Also, I think this behavior was changed in 1.11.1, as it was fine right after 1.11. Krellmax 14:34, 29 June 2006 (MDT)