WoW:API GetMapInfo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (converted page to use {{wowapi}}) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{wowapi}} __NOTOC__ | |||
mapFileName, textureHeight, textureWidth = GetMapInfo(); | mapFileName, textureHeight, textureWidth = GetMapInfo(); | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Note that the width and height aren't in a consistent order with most of the other API functions. Neither of the values are used by the UI so it's impossible to tell whether this is a deliberate inconsistency or a typo! The return values would appear to imply they are, however, reversed from the usual width, height convention. -- [[User:Flickering|Flickering]] 16:42, 26 Dec 2004 (EST) | Note that the width and height aren't in a consistent order with most of the other API functions. Neither of the values are used by the UI so it's impossible to tell whether this is a deliberate inconsistency or a typo! The return values would appear to imply they are, however, reversed from the usual width, height convention. -- [[User:Flickering|Flickering]] 16:42, 26 Dec 2004 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:18, 23 June 2006
← WoW API < GetMapInfo
mapFileName, textureHeight, textureWidth = GetMapInfo();
Return the map information about the current world map texture.
- Arguments
- none
- Returns
- mapFileName, textureHeight, textureWidth
- mapFileName
- String - The name of the file containing the textures for the current world map (nil for the whole world, BUT the official API catches this with a comment of Temporary Hack and uses the value "World" instead!)
- textureHeight
- Number - The height of the specified texture (0 if no texture)
- textureWidth
- Number - The width of the specified texture (0 if no texture) (This is a guess, it's not used in the UI)
- DetailsP
Note that the width and height aren't in a consistent order with most of the other API functions. Neither of the values are used by the UI so it's impossible to tell whether this is a deliberate inconsistency or a typo! The return values would appear to imply they are, however, reversed from the usual width, height convention. -- Flickering 16:42, 26 Dec 2004 (EST)